"" Does anyone in their right mind believes that Rufi Echeverría, Iruin and other ETA mafia will do anything from now than they've always done, threaten and extort for mayor and council? ""
Según el guión establecido por los negociadores, Batasuna ha movido ficha. En primer lugar, cabe recordar lo evidente, que no está ilegalizada por no condenar a ETA, sino por ser ETA. Sus dirigentes, alguno de los cuales hemos visto sonriendo inocentemente en el Euskalduna, son dirigentes de ETA. No metafóricamente, sino en términos literales. No son mandados, sino que mandan: en el pasado han elaborado la estrategia para la banda, la han ordenado y la han llevado a cabo. Conviene recordar que de lo que se está hablando es de abrir la puerta a delincuentes, que llevan años dirigiendo la máquina exterminadora etarra, que huelen que apestan a Goma-2 y a los que costó expulsar. The Parties Act was not intended that the parties they had pretty nice formulas in statute, but to prevent ETA institutions use to crime and extortion, using democracy against itself destabilizing and intimidating. Does anyone in their right mind believes that Rufi Echeverría, Iruin and other ETA mafia will do anything from now than they've always done, threaten and extort for mayors and councilors? Does anyone think minimally sane Basque and Navarre institutions are not going to see disrupted when they enter through the front door away with their activities? Permitting them is like being allowed in 1945 to sit Göring again in the Reichstag: for progressives in Madrid will be the end of something for the Goyerri constitutional council, the beginning of a nightmare future.
Except surprises ETA lists will be certified under the pretext that they are impossible to outlaw according to the scheme in 2007, when a list is arbitrarily accepted them and others do not. Police reports were ignored by Rubalcaba then and they will now. Confidence in the justice after what happened then meaningless. The decision is not in the courtroom, but in the offices of Ferraz, Moncloa and the Ministry of Interior. Second, Caamaño, in relation to treatment with ETA, was in 2006 as involved as Rubalcaba. Even without being a minister, was commissioned to study ways to overcome legal obstacles to the integration of Navarra in Basque Country. Today is an enthusiastic supporter of the negotiation with ETA, so little can be expected in connection with the Ministry of Justice, rather than more dust in robes dragged.
As recognized El Pais, a stronghold of the negotiation, Eguiguren is the great defender of the process. In 2006, ETA claimed that the Socialists had suggested the use of acronyms ANV to sneak into the institutions. And in this case, the statement is the product Batasuna conversations and advanced, which no stranger to international negotiators, as you said Salvador Ulay, make cash at the expense of the dead. There is a roadmap that will see unfold in the coming days and weeks in a carefully staged. The Socialists are no strangers to the Bilbao declaration
Where is the resistance to the covenants? First, it is clear that victims took to the streets last Saturday were right. If they want to prevent the murderers and their accomplices are in institutions, victims must go again, they could be joined, because the tsunami was the lead negotiator ahead of them all. Second, Popular Party must choose between the consensus trap the siren song of the Government and the victims and their social base. The position held so far, ignoring the evidence and looking the other hand, it is no longer tenable. Between the doctrine Aznar of total and uncompromising struggle against ETA, Zapatero's policy of reaching out is no middle ground. Who is unwilling to confront and publishers Rubalcaba The Country forcing the surrender, it is best to remove in the middle. Finally, the presence of Batasuna and ETA rehabilitation is something that unites all the English left, from the media to political parties. To carry out a negotiation that was not necessary, the social climate twitch, and 2006 will be brought to the "enemies of peace", and coexistence will tighten again as then. The breakdown of the constitutional consensus has been demonstrated by this case, both joined the left, with the exception of the Social Democratic-UPyD in 2006, compared to those who did not want the pact with ETA. Input, Felipe Gonzalez, whose fight against terrorism can be summarized in two words, GAL and Algiers-supported by the PSOE and has drawn Mayor Oreja as annoying opponent. This is perhaps the worst, because the return of ETA to the institutions of the socialist labor division is price depth of the English.
0 comments:
Post a Comment